This article was originally published in 2015 and has been completely updated in 2020.
Why push for stronger employee engagement? Well, a whole range of benefits are generated from treating employee engagement as a priority, even the most important organizational priority. Some of the most important benefits are listed below, as discussed in an 2018 article by Quantum Workplace. Every benefit is backed up by research referred in the article:
What’s more, when Gallup researchers conducted a meta-analysis in 2016 on the relationships between engagement at work and organizational outcomes in 230 organizations employing 1.8 million workers, they found consistently strong connection between results. Meta-analysis is a statistical technique that combines results of studies with seemingly unrelated findings, correcting for sampling, measurement error and variables to understand the true relationship with greater precision. The findings: “Business/work units scoring in the top half on employee engagement nearly double their odds of success compared with those in the bottom half.” This meant: “The relationship between engagement and performance at the business/work unit level is substantial and highly generalizable across organizations.”
Within the same study, Gallup conducted analysis across organizations with ‘similar outcome metric types.’ [Whatever that means. Who are they trying to impress with this jargon??] Anyhow, “Comparing top-quartile with bottom-quartile engagement business units resulted in median percentage differences of:
10% in customer loyalty/engagement
21% in profitability
20% in productivity — sales
17% in productivity — production records and evaluations
24% in turnover for high-turnover companies (those with more than 40% annualized turnover)
59% in turnover for low-turnover companies (those with 40% or lower annualized turnover)
70% in safety incidents
28% in shrinkage [employee stealing at work]
41% in absenteeism
58% in patient safety incidents
40% in quality (defects)”
Unfortunately, societal leaders are not trusted to address community-wide challenges. In the 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer survey, half (51%) of the 32,000 respondents agreed with the statement about CEOs that “I do not have confidence that our current leaders will be able to successfully address our country’s challenges.” Also, when the question, “How important is it to you that the CEO or head of the organization you work for speaks out publicly about each of the following issues?”, 92% of employed respondents agreed it is important, as shown in the image below. Comparatively few CEOs and senior leaders make the effort to seek the wider community’s trust. In addition, 73% of employed respondents said they expected a prospective employer to include them in organizational planning. On a more positive note, 76% of employed respondents said they trusted their employer, but only 58% said they trusted business in general.
Employees also want to hear from divisional heads and other general managers relevant to them. In large organizations the divisional heads are like mini-CEOs. They are responsible for translating the CEO’s message to their staff for them to understand the context. Gallup research shows that employee engagement comes from leaders. People look to their leaders to set the tone and expectations. Senior employees often have the power to make decisions that will significantly impact the collective work experience of the people below them, but at the same time, they are removed from those people. This is largely because, as employees rise within their organization, their responsibilities shift from considering how their team feels to shaping organization-wide purpose. Doing what is right for their company and doing what will make their employees happiest are not always mutually exclusive, according to business consultant and author, Ron Carucci, in a 2019 Harvard Business Review article.
In a study of 190 organizations, Gallup found that executive leaders influence frontline employee engagement indirectly and directly. Mainly indirectly through their influence on the people they directly manage, and directly through specific performance management elements, including clear expectations, discussions of progress and a mission or purpose that people can identify with.
Too many CEOs act as managers, not leaders. They concentrate on technical things – planning, organizing, controlling and solving problems. Leaders should be role models, trendsetters, visionaries and voices for change. The CEO needs to:
Gallup has identified best-practice actions and recommends that executives shape this strategic alignment, in this order:
Around 70% of the variance in team engagement is determined solely by the manager, according to Gallup research.Therefore, engagement should be a manager’s primary role responsibility. But, all too often, the very managers upon whom organizations depend to create better cultures are themselves unhappy and unmotivated at work. Management really isn’t a great experience for most people; managers report more stress and burnout, worse work-life balance, and worse physical well-being than the individual contributors on the teams they lead. Approximately two-thirds of managers are either not engaged or are actively disengaged in their work and workplace.
Organizations have a long way to go when it comes to developing managers, Gallup explains in this 2020 article:
Jim Harter, Gallup Chief Scientist wrote in a 2019 Harvard Business Review article:
“Shifting how your company trains and supports managers, and repositioning them as coaches, is essential for helping managers to change culture. The transition from boss to coach means managers are expected to do a lot more than give orders and delegate assignments—a primary role is to develop stars through collaborative goal setting, future-oriented coaching, and achievement-oriented accountability. Moving your managers from boss to coach not only increases employee engagement and improves performance, but it’s also essential to changing your culture to align with the changing workforce – a workforce that no longer wants, nor responds to, the traditional ‘command and control,’ top-down boss.”
For best results, team engagement should be part of a manager’s evaluation. Managers must be selected, trained and supported as exceptional developers of talent. And they should be evaluated on their ability to cultivate fresh talent, help employees develop new skills and improve their performance, and prepare employees for higher levels of leadership and achievement. If low engagement persists, it’s time for leaders to change their managers. Gallup says the desired process for CEOs to initiate is:
Employee engagement involves the basic psychological needs that must be met for employees to perform their specific roles well, on an everyday basis. Employee engagement remains crucial because engaged employees show up — physically, emotionally and cognitively. They are enthusiastic about what they have to do, and they naturally find ways to improve and excel. They generate most of the creativity, innovation and excellence in your organization. Engagement should be a pillar of every organization’s everyday management and employee experience strategy.
In the employee life cycle, engagement is at the center and it’s a critical component at each stage.
Furthermore, engagement involves the daily execution of one’s role, and increasing employee engagement is primarily the responsibility of managers. Gallup’s analysis shows that the manager alone accounts for 70% of the variance in team engagement. They are critical to engagement and to getting the employee experience right throughout the life cycle.
Engagement should be a pillar of every organization’s everyday management and employee experience strategy. Not a separate initiative or only thought of during one of the seven touch points on the employee life cycle.
Employee engagement is an ongoing part of the employee experience, according to Gallup. Employee experience has been an increasing focus in recent years because “the path to engagement is through employee experience,” in the view of corporate communicator, author and lecturer Aniisu Verghese in a 2020 IPR article. Also, business consultants believe it is a more tangible concept than employee engagement. Gallup simply defines the employee experience as “the journey an employee takes with your organization.” It is the sum of all interactions an employee has with an employer, from pre-recruitment to post-exit and everything in between. “It includes everything from major milestones and personal relationships to technology use and the physical work environment.”
The following are three key phases Gallup says every organization should consider when developing an employee experience strategy:
Out of all the interactions an employee has with their employer, Gallup identifies 7 critical stages that have the most influence on employees’ perceptions of their organization. An effective communication strategy is needed for all of these stages to make a fulfilling employee experience:
Workers of today want:
The CEO should communicate with employees to:
Measuring the CEO’s communication effectiveness:
The CEO has a symbolic communication role. Employees want him (it’s usually a male), to communicate the big picture, especially future plans and goals. They want to hear from the CEO about results, progress, achievements, downsizing and other big picture issues including the impact on their jobs – the self interest or “What’s in it for me?” factor. The CEO’s visibility is critical; the extent will vary according the size of the organization. Using electronic media is a poor substitute for a live appearance.
Why is the CEO so important? The CEO has the most influence over the entire organization and its culture and can usually make things happen. Research shows that CEO reputation is important to an organization’s success and is one of its most valuable and competitive assets. Weber Shandwick and KRC’s 2015 global online survey found that on average 45% of a company’s reputation depended on the reputation of their CEO. Although the immediate supervisor or manager is the key person for day-to-day communication, the CEO is the decision maker at the top of the organizational structure.
As a communicator, you can play a key role in improving employee perceptions of your leaders through the interactions you arrange between employees and management. For instance, you can write articles with the by-line of the CEO and other senior managers, you can increase the number of employees who meet the CEO and senior management during site visits, ‘road shows’ and staff meetings. More than 70% of employees say these meetings provide the information they need or find useful for their job, according to Gray’s surveys.
PR staff can also translate corporate strategy into day-to-day terms for employees and explain decisions to them. It is important to avoid the common mistake of over-promising through being over-optimistic about corporate plans.
Significant corporate information should be shared quickly before the rumor mill starts working.
With ‘road shows’ and staff meetings it is important to find out ahead about hot local issues from local PR and HR staff. Topics of discussion should focus on what the employees say they want to hear from senior management. Information should be presented for 25% of the allocated time while the rest of the time should be used for two-way dialogue and questions.
By Leandro Herrero CEO of The Chalfont Project. Building Remarkable Organisations and Social Movements powered by Viral Change
By Nicole Garrison A few years ago, virtual team meetings were common only for IT firms and startups. But COVID-19
[Framing of concepts is vital to successful leadership communication. Frames provide people with a quick and easy way to process