Government is the most important crisis news source

June 1, 2020

US research has found, surprisingly, that the most important sources of news during a crisis came from government – either politicians or employees of regulatory agencies. This finding points to the need to brief government stakeholders as a pressing priority during a crisis, preferably as part of ongoing communication programs.

Government at various levels, including regulatory bodies, becomes involved with crises. It is therefore essential that preparation is conducted ahead of any crisis about the compliance, regulatory or investigative role of government in the range of possible crises your organization may confront.

An effective plan for government communication during a crisis is:

  • You should identify the politicians, advisers and officials who would be involved in the range of crisis threats your organization may face. The processes, powers and responsibilities of each person and department should be identified.
  • The crisis strategy and communication process should be briefed to the relevant departments.
  • The relevant government departments should be involved in crisis simulations

Develop partner relationships beforehand

A partner is any organization with a role in aiding the response, including regulatory bodies. Partner relationships should be developed ahead of any crises so there is a solid foundation for well-coordinated work through each crisis. Typical partners may be the police and fire and ambulance emergency service units, State emergency services, utilities, and health and medical authorities, as well as entities with safety regulatory responsibilities.

In cases where your organization is geographically dispersed, the relationships should be developed at each location of operations, where the contact telephone number and email address for every nominated contact person in the partner organization should be documented and updated every three months.

Each potential partner would play a specific role during a crisis, which should be determined beforehand by agreement with them or should be developed in the early stages of the crisis. Each partner should nominate its representative who has the authority to make decisions during the crisis.

A plan should be drafted for partner communication during a crisis (eg, email alerts, faxes, conference calls) to which everyone has agreed.

Despite every good intention to show partners a preview of media releases, it may not be possible to do so. Some aspects may be time-sensitive, and the crisis communication head may decide not to share this information due to the possibility or likelihood of a leak or premature public reference to the information by partners – not necessarily intentionally.

Such leaks would most likely be made by people other than the contact person – people who may not be aware of the sensitive nature of the information or may be too rushed to remember. At the least, partners should be supplied with information at the same time as the media.

Kim Harrison

Kim J. Harrison has authored, edited, coordinated, produced and published the material in the articles and ebooks on this website. He brings his experience in professional communication and business management to provide helpful insights to readers around the world. As he has progressed through his wide-ranging career, his roles have included corporate affairs management; PR consulting; authoring many articles, books and ebooks; running a university PR course; and business management. Kim has received several international media relations awards and a website award. He has been quoted in The New York Times and various other news media, and has held elected positions with his State and National PR Institutes.

Leave a comment

Please read and respect our Comments Policy before engaging.

0 Comments

Further Reading

Is your CEO really the best crisis spokesperson?

What to say in a crisis and who should say it? Those two questions can determine whether your organization’s reputation is enhanced or irreparably damaged when things go wrong. Answering those questions also exposes four myths about crisis management. Myth 1: Only...

Medical apologies

'Deny and defend' a wrong tactic for medical errors Despite this basic psychology, 'deny and defend' has been the traditional mantra of malpractice lawyers and insurance companies. US studies have shown that only about 30% of medical errors have been disclosed to...

Share

No products in the cart

Send this to a friend