Good communication is key to successful mergers and acquisitions

Good communication is essential to successful mergers and acquisitions. The communication role needs to begin during the preliminary stages to set the scene. Too often the communication starts too late and doesn’t deal sufficiently with the post-merger integration issues.

Mergers and acquisitions go through three broad phases. As part of an AT Kearney global survey, the question, “Which phase bears the greatest risk of failure?”, brought the following response:

  1. Strategy development, target shortlisting, due diligence – 30%
  2. Negotiation and closing the deal – 17%
  3. Post-merger integration – 53%

This response shows that the most important time for a merger or takeover is when the deal has been formalized and the more difficult stage of ‘bedding down’ the process has started, requiring intensive communication. However, there is a case that communication should start early to pave the way for internal acceptance and post-merger integration.

Overwhelming experience indicates directly or indirectly that people issues are the main reason for takeover failures. And communication is central to the people issues.

McKinsey studies show that “management of the human side of the merger is the real key to maximizing the value of the deal.” Watson Wyatt Worldwide found that “cultural incompatibility was consistently the biggest barrier to integration.” Mercer Human Resource Consultants found that out of three key merger factors – people, processes and systems – only people issues made a difference to the success of mergers.

Effective employee communication is the first or second most important issue emerging in all studies of mergers. Internal communication and culture changes are identified as the hardest to achieve, but the most important in merger success. And, tragically, they are generally under-resourced in post-merger integration, and are often absent before the deal and the due diligence phases. Interestingly, customer issues are also extremely poorly resourced.

How could management do this? And how could highly paid management consultants let this happen? The two most important constituencies to look after – customers and employees – have largely been ignored. It defies logic!

To make matters worse, research by the International Association of Business Communicators (IABC) showed that most of the merger communication budgets around the world have been spent on external communication rather than employee communication!

Regardless of the brilliance of the vision and the fit in a merger, the subsequent success of the deal depends mostly on the employees. They are the ones whose day-to-day actions can make a merger work or can sink it after the deal is done. And a sufficient investment in internal communication is the link in keeping the employee attitudes positive towards the changes brought about by the merger.

Communicate early

Even before a formal merger or acquisition is underway, employees often become aware from indirect information or by chance that something is in the air. It is human nature to want to know what is happening. If they feel management is keeping information from them, quite understandably they start to feel anxious.

When people are uncertain, they start to speculate about the clues in front of them. Invariably this interpretation of clues becomes paranoia as they chat to workmates and quickly develop a view that a management conspiring the worst. The grapevine goes overtime with rumors. Productivity starts to drop as staff waste time in discussing rumors and losing some of their motivation. With well-developed rumors, some staff actually start to leave the company before, as they believe, the bad news hits.

When a merger is announced, staff in the acquiring company may not feel concerned initially. They belong to the new parent and don’t anticipate much change. This sense of security is not always justified because the process of establishing the new joint organization can reveal areas of the acquiring company that could be improved.

Address employee anxiety

If two roughly equal parties merge, change will hit both sides. Employees will become anxious about their jobs. They will suddenly have to confront:

  • loss of status and influence;
  • uncertainty about the employer’s plans;
  • a fight for individual survival as fear of job cuts takes hold;
  • increased workloads because some people leave voluntarily or involuntarily;
  • a spillover effect into individuals’ lives.

Difficult and complex to communicate effectively

Effective strategic communication plays a key role in addressing these issues, but is difficult and complex:

  • Communication demands intensive time from senior management at a time when they may be totally devoted to the technical and financial aspects of the deal, and may not have sufficiently considered the impact on others.
  • Often the skill of effective communication requires training because many managers have never received guidance on good interpersonal communication practices.
  • Communication doesn’t come easily to many managers who throughout most their careers have dealt almost entirely with hard facts and figures, not the ‘soft’ people issues – these managers may not be good enough as leaders.
  • Many managers are uncomfortable about giving tough messages to their staff, and being honest with them about bad news of job cuts or site closures.
  • Mergers involve many technical and complex issues required by law, the stock exchange, and regulatory bodies. Communication is not legally required and so it is an easy area to drop down the priority list.
  • Communication is not easily quantified and measured, which makes it difficult to grapple with when merger budgets are being considered.
  • The communication function isn’t always represented at a sufficiently high level within the organization, and even then the head of the function may not be strategically minded.

Lack of information flow from the upper levels of management will cause problems for the first-line managers and supervisors who need to deal with the frontline employees every day. They will not know enough information to satisfy the day-to-day needs of their staff. This creates the dreaded communication vacuum – filled by the grapevine – that will undermine the positive aspects of the merger.

After the merger

After a merger takes effect, strategic communication is central to the integration of the two organizations into a more effective single entity. By definition, this requires change communication.

Effective communication during the post-merger phase is required to:

  • ensure a common understanding of the business case for the merger and the vision for the future;
  • help people understand and internalize change;
  • keep the organization focused on customers and productivity;
  • reinforce desired behaviors;
  • promote cultural alignment;
  • help with retention and motivation of key talent;
  • control the rumor mill.

Good communication practices in the post-merger period are:

  • Recognize that all merger goals depend on communication. Employees have to be persuaded to believe in the corporate vision and to act to bring it about. This is a communication task.
  • Know the communication goals. At all times, with all stakeholders, the goal for the communication needs to be kept in the forefront of the mind. Senior managers need to know their constituencies closely and to segment them carefully.
  • Managers need to be aware of the logistical and cultural factors necessary to communicate with staff in diverse locations.
  • Be flexible. Bring the best combination of communication techniques to bear on the situation and be prepared to adjust according to feedback.
  • Listen. Dialogue is the richest form of feedback, but not the only one.
  • Always communicate. Non-communication is still communication because it sends negative messages.
  • Follow a framework to help manage the complexity. Understand all stakeholders, know the goals, write a plan, craft messages positively and effectively, select media carefully. (Compare the difference between “We don’t expect any staff reductions,” and “There will be no staff reductions” and even better, a more positive “We all have important roles to play in the future.”)
  • Check senior managers’ commitment to the message and their ability to communicate it consistently, firmly and honestly.

Kim Harrison

Kim J. Harrison has authored, edited, coordinated, produced and published the material in the articles and ebooks on this website. He brings his experience in professional communication and business management to provide helpful insights to readers around the world. As he has progressed through his wide-ranging career, his roles have included corporate affairs management; PR consulting; authoring many articles, books and ebooks; running a university PR course; and business management. Kim has received several international media relations awards and a website award. He has been quoted in The New York Times and various other news media, and has held elected positions with his State and National PR Institutes.

Content Authenticity Statement. AI is not knowingly used in the writing or editing of any content, including images, in these newsletters, articles or ebooks. If AI-produced content is contained in any published form in future, this will be reported to readers.

Leave a comment

Please read and respect our Comments Policy before engaging.


Further Reading

Communication Campaign Plans

Related Articles

A plan is not a strategy

A comprehensive plan - with goals, initiatives, and budgets – is comforting. But starting with a plan is a terrible way to create strategy. A business plan is not a strategy. Developing strategy means going outside an organization’s comfort zone and escaping the...

Strategy doesn't equal planning.

No products in the cart

Send this to a friend